The Internet :: essays research papers

Right now Im thinking almost the Internet, the all-pervasive medium through which Ive published my thoughts and work Ive make in my free time for several years now. Like mostly everyone else, I communicate with new(prenominal)s using the Internet, play games through it, read news, and learn about things. (Except, sadly, I am not convinced the ecumenical public is interested in learning.) And we be all familiar with the "dot com mania" and the insane full in the NASDAQ - and, sadly, the subsequent fall of the NASDAQ. People have been wondering exactly what was behind all of this, and if the Internet - which once seemed so enticing - is now bogus. "What we are entering is a power age, and the importance of the power age lies in its ability, rightly used with the wage motive behind it, to increase and cheapen exertion so that all of us may have more of this worlds goods. The way to liberty, the way to equality of opportunity, the way from empty phrases to actualities , lies through power" - Henry pass over Heres something which should not be news the entire .com insanity was a crock from the start Thats right - the entire New Economy was founded on delusions and misinformation all along. scarcely just as people were overzealous then, they are overly pessimistic now (at the time of this writing). The Internet is not intrinsically a crock. But the general public got a taste of what the Internet can do, and warped and distorted it into a magical cure-all for all of lifes problems. The Internet cannot produce material objects completely industry can. The Internet can near-instantaneously transport information from any location to any location, but it cannot transport atoms. And while information is fun and happy, many other things we enjoy (such as books (for now), pizza, and computers) are made of heavy, sluggish atoms. Throwing up a web site does not automatically mean instant wealth, nor does a chassis that ends in ".com". This ha s always been true, and will continue to be true (for a while...), but for a short time most everyone deluded themselves into believing the exact opposite. And regular technically knowledgeable people (such as myself, and many others who knew what the Internet was before everyone and his uncle came onto the scene) were caught up in the hysteria, because the Internet is indeed really cool, and it seemed it was the time when everyone was becoming cognizant of that fact too.

The Jesus I Never Knew by Phillip Yancey Essay -- The Jesus I Never Kn

The Jesus I Never Knew by Phillip Yancey Yancey starts out with the image of Jesus. When he was young he had image Jesus to have angelic features such as, young, handsome, and a compassionate face. It wasnt until he entered into a Christian college, that he was introduced to the real image of Jesus. I had an straightaway connection with Yancey. I too had an image of Christ in my head, which consisted of Hollywood portrayals and those in classical paintings. It wasnt till I engaged myself at a Christian college, that I have now received a new and more accurate picture of Christ. His book, The Jesus I Never Knew, questions the reader with the thought, How galore(postnominal) Christians today are in the same position, not fully understanding Christs mission and purpose? Yancey divides the novel into three main sections Who He Was, Why He Came, and What He Left Behind. The section that I connected with was Why He Came. I enjoyed reading this section, because he points out key t houghts on Jesus life that we take for granted. I like how it explains the reason for His arrival on earth through the Beatitudes and His Resurrection. The chapter on the Beatitudes, Yancey covers a great deal of study that shows how Jesus cares for the less fortunate and humble. Yancey points out that the Beatitudes describe the present and future, a fact that I never realized. He tells of how they are a contrast on how we can succeed in the kingdom of Heaven verses the kingdom...

The Driving Age :: essays research papers

Many teens are interested in being able to drive at a younger days, but it is encumber mum unclear if they are able to handle it. If the legal driving age is lowered, are we endangering the lives of teen drivers, as well as the passengers with them? I believe or so people want to drive as soon as they can. However, recently the government has been trying to pass laws that may change the current driving age of 16. There are positive and negative aspects to changing the laws that allow the driving age to stay at 16.There have been new bills being proposed that mite be passed. The Minister for Urban Services has introduced a card (proposed law) into the Assembly. He wants to amend the Road Transport (Driver Licensing) Act 2000. The new Bill is called the Driving Age Amendment Bill. This Bill is intended to raise the age at which people can apply for a learners permit and drivers license. (Legislative Assembly). This bill leave raise the driving age if it is passed but the aspect s of what allow for happen should be considered before we change it. There are many different reasons why we should keep it at 16. First off its a good working system that we have followed for a long time. Another good reason that helps this pattern is that the teenagers are still in school so its easier for them to take drivers training. If there are more drivers that ultimately mean that more people will be paying for insurance. There are also the reasons why we should change it from 16. Like for instances most 16 year olds arent responsible enough to drive. The facts exhibit that younger drivers (those between ages 16 and 25) receive more citations, are more likely to have their driving privilege suspended, and are responsible for more accidents than drivers in any other age group. (Dr. Steven Evans). Another reason is that its a high cost own a car when they are making so little money.If we were to raise the driving age it would most likely be changed to 18. The best reasons for raising it to 18 would probably be that they are more responsible. Children are not equipped to handle these vehicles, which are hard for even an experienced, adult driver to handle. (Ron Shaffer) They have More money because of there jobs and if you go away from inhabitancy you need a license.

The Causes Of The World Trade Center Bombing :: essays research papers

In September 1929, "the Roaring Twenties," "the Era of Wonderful Nonsense," of sex, booze and jazz, give the axeed with the stocktaking market crash that began the Great Depression. There followed the "low dishonest decade" of poet W. H. Audens depiction, as Western statesmen sought to appease their way to security and peace. On Sept. 11, 2001, as the 767s smashed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center and Pentagon, killing 5,000 Americans, a nonher unserious era of sex scandals and stock market silliness came to an end. Recall, if you will, the summer of 2001. The story that had CNN, MSNBC and make News transfixed was the saga of Gary Condit. Nightly, talk-show hosts demanded answers to the great questions Why did Gary throw away the watch box? Where did stewardess Anne Marie Smith spend her D.C. nights? By Sept. 11, the story seemed about to end in a great courtroom drama, with Anne Marie charging Gary with libel for denying she committed adulte ry. What will the decade be remembered for? The Trial of O. J.? Who killed Jon-Benet Ramsey? The Oval Office trysts of Bill and Monica? Condit summer? Meanwhile, not to worry about the world. For America is "the last superpower," the "indispensable nation." The New Economy will take us to "Dow 36,000" "Pax Americana" and "Global Democracy" are our destiny. On Sept. 11, the frivolous era came to an end. Suddenly, for the first time since Gen. Jackson drove the British army out of Louisiana, the enemy was inside the gates, slaughtering thousands. Why? Because we adopted an open-borders policy that left-hand(a) tens of millions of illegal aliens wandering about America, few of whom had any loyalty to us, some of whom were willing to murder us on the orders of their foreign masters. To keep the cost of repel down, we let millions of strangers, and not a few enemies, into our home. Never before has America been so vulnerable, and corporate greed and craven politics did it to us. Tuesday, the U.S. reported that industrial payoff fell for the 12th straight month. Bethlehem Steel became the latest U.S. company to go Chapter 11. U.S. factories now produce at 75 percent of capacity. Last year, the U.S. trade deficit in manufactureds hit $324 billion and the merchandise trade deficit $450 billion. The de-industrialization of America is well advanced. In a triumph of the globalists, America has become again what she has not been in generations a dependent nation.

Deficiencies In Development Of Cocaine Children :: essays research papers

It has been estimated by the National Institute on Drug Abuse that every year 40,000 babies are born(p) to mothers who bugger off used cocaine during their pregnancy. Unfortunately, the outcome is unfair for these children, be create the mothers do not take into consideration that they are responsible for another persons life. These children have various levels of deficiencies in the learning process and in the way that they behave. The levels of deficiencies in children vary in accordance with the mothers consumption of cocaine. Thereby not only are there defects at birth, but also later on in the developmental years. Women who use cocaine while pregnant cause a great damage to their children during the developmental years especially in the aspects of cognitive motor and social/ behavioral deficiencies.Cognitive deficiencies are those that deal with an someones thinking and reasoning process. These abilities are seen in the beginning rail years, not at birth, but are the subtle characteristics that only through the school environment can be recognized. In a class environment, the deficiencies of a cocaine child are often confused with those of a disruptive child. The be truth is teachers are not able to cope with them on an individual basis and give them more attention.An initial sign that some children demonstrate is a lack of concentration on virtually every task. Excessive disorganization beyond that of regular children along with being more than just the class iniquity can be characteristics of cocaine-exposed children. While most children are able to stay on task, these children will be easily deterred if given the opportunity. These children tend to exhibit a lack of exploration of the environment which results in less pretend play (Cates, 68). In a study done by Mayes, when given a calamity of toys, for example they spend less time exploring the new toys than do the control children (Vogel, 39). Another pending issue is that cocaine-exposed chil dren do as well as regular children in settings with no distractions, such as a one-on-one quiet room session. The truth is that in real life there are a plethora of distractions. A study conducted at Wayne State University, in Detroit found that teachers rated 27 cocaine-exposed 6-year-olds as having significantly more trouble paying attention than 75 non-exposed children (the teachers did not receive who was who) (Begley, 1997, 63). Imitative play is a way of learning for toddlers, which drug-exposed children are less likely to demonstrate.

Deficiencies In Development Of Cocaine Children :: essays research papers

It has been estimated by the National Institute on Drug Abuse that every year 40,000 babies are born to mothers who have used cocaine during their pregnancy. Unfortunately, the outcome is unfair for these children, because the mothers do non take into consideration that they are responsible for another persons life. These children have various levels of deficiencies in the learning process and in the way that they behave. The levels of deficiencies in children vary in accordance with the mothers consumption of cocaine. thereby not only are there defects at birth, but also later on in the developmental years. Women who use cocaine while pregnant cause a great damage to their children during the developmental years especially in the aspects of cognitive motor and social/ behavioral deficiencies.Cognitive deficiencies are those that breed with an individuals thinking and reasoning process. These abilities are seen in the beginning school years, not at birth, but are the subtle char acteristics that only by means of the school environment can be recognized. In a dissever environment, the deficiencies of a cocaine child are often confused with those of a dissolute child. The underlying truth is teachers are not able to cope with them on an individual basis and give them more attention.An initial sign that some children butt against is a lack of concentration on virtually every task. Excessive disorganization beyond that of regular children along with being more than just the class nuisance can be characteristics of cocaine-exposed children. While most children are able to stay on task, these children will be easily deterred if given the opportunity. These children tend to award a lack of exploration of the environment which results in less pretend play (Cates, 68). In a study done by Mayes, when given a box of toys, for example they spend less time exploring the new toys than do the control children (Vogel, 39). Another pending issue is that cocaine-exposed children do as well as regular children in settings with no distractions, such as a one-on-one quiet room session. The truth is that in real life there are a superfluity of distractions. A study conducted at Wayne State University, in Detroit found that teachers rated 27 cocaine-exposed 6-year-olds as having significantly more trouble paying attention than 75 non-exposed children (the teachers did not know who was who) (Begley, 1997, 63). Imitative play is a way of learning for toddlers, which drug-exposed children are less likely to demonstrate.

Wellness assessment

My overall state of my wellness wheel is pretty well. It was close to half and half with my assessment. The lowest my average assessment went down to was a two. That was in the social area which is my weakest. My weakest areas are vocational, social, and Intellectual. I scored rightfully low In social area because I dont gain out much, I keep to myself and I am too busy Juggling sports, school and work. I really dont have much time for anything else. My strongest areas were physical, emotional, and spiritual.I was not surprised with the results of the assessment I knew I wasnt going to score very high In the social area. In the emotional area I knew I was going to score high because If I did something wrong I wouldnt say somebody else did It, I would own up to what I did and take responsibility for whatever I did wrong. The reason for this Is the more you lie about something the more It will come ski binding and bite you In the butt harder than Just saying something In the begin ning. My emotional well-being right owe is pretty good.I accept all opinions even if I dont agree with it. I listen to everyone around me because someone may just want someone to listen to what they have to say and get whatever it is off their shoulders. I however, sometimes have a hard time opening up to people because if I do they might think the wrong thing. My prove level is very high right now because of certain twists and turns my life has taken. The major stresses in my life would be family issues and relationships, finances, work and school.These things take a major part in my stress level. The first two are the major impacts right now. I relieve stress by working out, or working. There isnt really anything to mete out my stress right now. In a year or less my stress level will go down hopefully. I am managing my stress level very well from what everyone tells me. Wellness assessment By movement and intellectual. I scored really low in social area because I dont get out mu ch, I keep to myself and I am too busy Juggling sports, school and work.I really dont have much very high in the social area. In the emotional area I knew I was going to score high because if I did something wrong I wouldnt say someone else did it, I would own up to what I did and take responsibility for whatever I did wrong. The reason for this is the more you lie about something the more it will come back and bite you in the butt harder than Just saying something in the beginning. My emotional well-being right everyone around me because someone may Just want someone to listen to what they

Alcoholism Problem Essay

tipsiness is a chronic problem that includes barrier in controlling drink, having to drink consistently to cast physical independence, being preoccupied with inebriantic beverage, and continually using alcohol regardless of problems it causes (Brick, 2004). alcohol should not be legal in U.S. because it is impacts negatively on health, family, association and on a persons re output. Alcohol alcoholism is like taking a drug. It is a form of drug addiction and drug abuse. inebriation is a worldwide problem that have-to doe withs many great deal. Drinking alcohol has negative short and long term make. Alcoholism has been associated with ill personal effects on health, family, company, and education (Marshall, 2000). However, the effects on a person depends on particular factors such as how often and how much alcohol is taken, a persons age, gender, when a person begun drinking and how long they have been drinking, their health, and family history (Begleiter & Kissin, 1996 ). It is in this regard that alcohol should not be legal in the united States. Alcohol is addictive, and people become addicts end up spending a lot of money on alcohol. It means that when they spend all the money they have on alcohol, they obturate their families, and ar not able to support the community in anyway.Some resort to stealing to sustain their drinking habit. Alcohol addicts sometimes engage in robbery acts to get the money for drinks. Community becomes at risk of destruction with exuberant alcohol consumption allowed. When many people engage in excessive consumption of alcohol, education becomes at risk. People drop out of school, and illiteracy level increase in the community. In addition, the progress and development of any community depends on the health of its people. Therefore, when alcohol puts the health of its members at risk, community suffers in the long run. Alcohol affects both female and male differently. Men who consume alcohol, chance(a) have an incr eased risk of health risks. Such men can experience cancer and heart disease in the long-term andlow capability to sexual difficulties in the short-term (Brick, 2004). Men are more likely to suffer from liver cirrhosis, and have higher chances of being diagnosed with high blood pressure. or so 26.6% of deaths among men of between 16 and 24 years old can be attributed to alcohol consumption. Men tend to be more dependent of alcohol (Marshall, 2000). Drinking too much alcohol damages a persons luggage compartment organs such as liver, brain, stomach, heart, and intestines.Brain is adversely moved(p) because the brain cells die leading to loss of memory, learning difficulties, brain disorders, confusion, and problems with attention (Blane & Leonard, 1999). Liver is highly affected because of the great possibility of developing cancer in the liver, throat and mouth. The stomach may in any case acquire ulcers. Long-term drinking has overly been cerebrate to stroke and heart failur e. The nervous system can also experience damage leading to behavioral and physical problems (Dasgupta, 2011). These problems affect health, family, community, and education in the long-term because of expenses associated with alcohol consumption, and possible treatment measures. Alcohol poses many effects on the body such as fertility. It inflicts levels of testosterone. As a result, it could decline sperm quantity and quality, and lead to loss of libido. Alcohol is toxic to the testicles, and affects hormones. It could hamper production of sperms, hinder them from developing properly, and slow their movement towards the egg. Alcohol can also limit the liver from metabolizing vitamin A properly.It also depresses the nervous system, and could result in difficulty in getting and keeping erection (Peters, 2008). Many young adults do not realize that alcohol has a fattening effect. Alcohol can reduce the amount of fat that the body burns for energy. The human body makes several attemp ts to eliminate alcohol very fast as it cannot remain in the body for storage. The process takes priority over nutrient absorption and burning of fat. In the long-term, there could be a serious damage in the appearance. early(a) effects include loss of hair in the body, breast enlargement, and withering of testicles (Dasgupta, 2011). Alcohol has also been associated with worsening of flake disorders such as rosacae. Rosacae skin disorder is answerable for expansion of blood vessels in the face making it redder. Heavy drinking can cause the appearance of pus spots and red bumps. It has also been linked to inflammation, pain and swelling in the joints. The effect is common among men of between 30 and 60 years old(Hannigan, Spear, Spear & Goodlett, 1999). As mentioned earlier, heavy drinking increases the chances of heart disease, liver damage, bone disease, cancer, anxiety and depression, and type II diabetes.Heavy consumption of alcohol also caused inflammation on the pancreas and irritates stomach. These effects indirectly affect family, community and education (Peters, 2008). Women are not safe from alcohol either. The body of women takes much time to process alcohol compared to men. Women feel more effects of alcohol than men even when they drink the same amount. The fertility of women is at risk with heavy consumption of alcohol. Women are high risk of acquiring breast cancer, and adverse impacts of the menopause. Women are advised in several studies to avoid alcohol when trying to have a baby. Alcohol disrupts menstrual cycle in women, and limits their chances of conceiving. These are bountiful effects on the body, and not good for family and community in general. Therefore, alcohol should not be legal in the United States (Hannigan, Spear, Spear & Goodlett, 1999). While drinking less alcohol may make one look good, heavy consumption causes bad skin, tired eyes, and weight gain for both female and male. It also interferes with peoples sleep. Heavy cons umers of alcohol often wake up and feel like they have not had enough rest. Alcohol dehydrates the body and skin. It deprives the skin of certain vital nutrients and vitamins. Hence, it is not good for health.Alcohol is also responsible for much divorce among couples due to fights in the family, and lack of finances for family upkeep (Dasgupta, 2011). Alcohol is depressant. It means that alcohol calms people down, and slows down some body organs. With only 0.05% level of blood-alcohol, a person begins getting dulled judgment, and his or her inhibitions get released. They whence become clumsy and start having slurred speech with only a 0.10% blood-alcohol level. At 0.30% level of blood-alcohol, one nearly becomes unconscious. Any addition after that becomes extremely dangerous since at 0.45%, one can get into a coma. Brain shuts down from 0.70% and stop controlling the heart, breathing, and one may end up dead. Other short-term effects include blurred vision, blackouts and insomnia . These can lead to injuries, accidents, and even death.Drinking alcohol also causes hangover in the next morning, which is associated with nausea, headaches, heartburn, fatigue, thirst, and dizziness. There are many side effects of alcohol (Peters, 2008).Conclusion In conclusion, consumption of alcohol should be reconsidered in U.S becauseof its adverse effects on health, family, community, and education. Alcohol should only be taken when necessary. The side effects are adverse and continue to destroy people across the world. Therefore, alcohol should not be legal in the United States because it is impacts negatively on health, family, community and on a persons education.ReferencesBegleiter, H., & Kissin, B. (1996). The pharmacology of alcohol and alcohol dependence. New York Oxford University Press.Blane, H. T., & Leonard, K. E. (1999). Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism. New York u.a. Guilford Press.Brick, J. (2004). handbook of the medical consequences of alcoho l and drug abuse. New York Haworth Press.Dasgupta, A. (2011). The science of drinking How alcohol affects your body and mind. Lanham, Md Rowman & Littlefield.Hannigan, J. H., Spear, L. P., Spear, N. E., & Goodlett, C. R. (1999). Alcohol and Alcoholism Effects on Brain and Development. Hoboken Taylor & Francis. Marshall, R. (2000). Alcoholism Genetic culpability or social irresponsibility the challenge of innovative methods to determine final outcomes. Lanham, MD University Press of America. Peters, A. R. (2008). Combined effects of alcohol and nicotine on subjective responses and cognitive functioning, Dissertation Abstracts International, 69-4

Discuss in detail Shakespeare’s presentation of women in Much Ado About Nothing

The role of women in the 1600s was to be submissive, passive, to obey men and to be seen rather than heard as is depicted in the female calibers in m some(prenominal) of Shakespe bes plays such(prenominal) as Juliet in Romeo and Juliet and Queen Gertrude in Hamlet. However, the char tourers in Shakespeares plays are predominantly male, they include real numberly(prenominal) few female examples and Much Ado Ab step up Nothing is no exception. Each of the female characters in this play represents a opposite role of a 16th century woman.The reason for the relatively small number of female characters in Shakespeares plays is for both practicality, as all female roles in Shakespeares plays were performed by men, however crapper also be seen as a diagnoseence to womens relatively insignifi stooget status in society. A womans virginity and chastity were what her genius was solely ground on. Her status was gained by marriage and women in this time were raised to believe they were inferior to men, this status is reflected in the character of hit man.Shakespeare seems to depict the conventional role of a Shakespearean woman through star. Her silent and submissive nature is what shows her weakness to world controlled by some other characters. This is predominantly men however, Beatrice also speaks over Hero, contend the male chauvinistic stereotype by placing characteristics commonly associated with males, in a female character. This is most noniceable in act 2 mount1, where Leonato, Beatrice, Hero and Antonio are discussing the topic of Heros future.Shakespeare uses Heros lack of a response to anything the other characters are proverb in deciding her fate to emphasise societys expectancies of Hero, and girls like Hero, in Shakespearean times. Shakespeare uses the character Beatrice to represent a less(prenominal) conventional 16th century woman, independent and outspoken. By contrasting the roles of Beatrice and Hero against each other in this agenc y Shakespeare more effectively presents the differences between these two characters. Shakespeare also mirrors the role of Beatrice in Margaret.Beatrice unlike Hero does non have a prestigious reputation to maintain. Other characters refer to Beatrice, often by name, in comparison to Hero as niece, daughter, and cousin. The delegacy in which Beatrice talks to the male characters is unusual for her time, she is outspoken and does non hold prat on voicing her opinions. In the 16th century women could be punished by law for having such mannerisms as this. Beatrice is particularly bitter towards Benedick, to whom she is rude, ignorant and seems to interest great delight in mocking at every available opportunity.In this respect Shakespeare challenges the male chauvinism of the time by matching Beatrice and Benedick, who both, at times, appear both as witty and stubborn as mavin another, despite Beatrice beingness a woman and therefore, supposedly (in accordance to societys hiera rchy at the time) an inferior match to Benedick. Beatrices stubborn nature is introduced from the very beginning of the play, in coiffe 1 Scene 1 where Beatrice makes no attempt to be problematic with her feelings towards Benedick.She promises to eat all of his k dizzying calling him weak and challenging the approbation he is receiving from the messenger who is saying he hath d star good service, lady, in these wars. It house be interpreted, however, that Beatrice is perhaps tasteing too hard to convince the other characters of how often she dislikes Benedick, suggesting her stubborn and cruel nature is all just an act, Shakespeare uses Beatrices intense saddle sore towards Benedick to provide the audience with sufficient evidence to suspect that something has happened between these two characters in the past to leave Beatrice with these thoughts.Shakespeare mirrors Beatrice in the character of Margaret. He seems to portray Margaret as a less powerful and dirtier minded Beat rice. She, like Beatrice, is outspoken and often seen as rude. However as Margaret is just a servant, Shakespeare uses this character for the lines that Beatrice could not get away with saying. The audience can more easily accept this rude and often suggestive (particularly when talking to male characters) humour. The suggestive aspect can be seen in act 5 scene 2. In which Margaret flirts with Benedick by saying will you write me a sonnet in praise of my beauty? Shakespeare tries to make it known to the audience that Margaret is aware of her lowly status, by writing lines for her that are jokes at her own expense, such as in act 5 scene 2 why shall I always keep below the stairs? , this can be interpreted however, as either Margarets sufferance of her role, or as a crude joke used to flirt with Benedick. Margarets comedy contrasts the intelligent wit Shakespeare writes for Beatrice. The character of Margarets purpose is to provide a different kind of humour in the play, perhaps as a relief from the witty and sarcastic banter between the other characters.Margaret talks back to Beatrice without any hesitation, as is seen in act 3 scene 4, where she mocks Beatrice in saying a maid and stuffed, this reinforces Margarets ill mannered nature, being used as a source of entertainment for the audience. This kind of talk would not be acceptable from the other characters, but Shakespeare builds up the character of Margaret to represent a more ill mannered and crude aspect of the play. Shakespeare does this both through Margarets main purpose as an accomplice in the shaming of Hero and the way in which she acts around the other characters, who are predominantly richer and more powerful than her.Margarets main purpose is to contribute to the shaming of Hero, which causes great controversy and outrage. Its possible that Shakespeare involves Margaret in this so fart as a way of informing the audience that Margaret is of a far lower status than the other characters and i ntroduces the idea that it is acceptable for her to do many things that for the other characters it is not. The prime example being that even suspicion alone that Hero could be involved in such affairs causes outrage, and yet when it is discovered that it was in fact Margaret, not much more is said some the incident.In Act 2 scene 1 Beatrice compares marriage to a scotch jig giving a very bleak outlook on the subject by saying for, hear me, Hero wooing, wedding, and repenting, is a scotch jig. By referring to the aftermath of the wedding as repenting Beatrice makes her opinions on marriage very clear. The expectancy of women of this time was to get married and have children, and so by portraying such a passionate self-exaltation towards the subject through Beatrice, Shakespeare challenges the stereotypical role of a woman.It is this attitude that likens Beatrice more so than Hero, to a modern sidereal sidereal day audience, the opinion that womens sole purpose is not to marry an d reproduce. Beatrice also makes a joke when Leonato says to her well, niece, I hope to see you one day fitted with a husband by responding with Adams son are my brethren and, truly, I hold it a sin to match in my kindred this joke can be taken either at face value, as something Shakespeare has reinforced up to be typical Beatrice, or seen as a way of avoiding what Leonato was really trying to say to her, as a way of covering her real feelings in case there is a lapse in her tough outer exterior.And yet when in Act 3 scene 1 when Hero, Margaret and Ursula try to gull Beatrice she seems, to a authoritative extent, to believe them. Shakespeares sudden portrayal of slight naivety in Beatrice can be interpreted as a way of showing the audience Beatrice has a more compassionate side, and that really she wants to believe this is true such as when she says and, Benedick, love on I will revenge thee. Another moment in which Beatrice shows compassion is when Benedick proposes his love to h er, and her immediate reaction is to tell him to kill Claudio for what he has done to her cousin, Hero.She uses Benedicks love for her cruelly as a way of forcing him to kill Claudio against his will when she says you kill me to deny it. Farewell. In some respects, the character of Beatrice is there to show an independent and opinionated woman, proxy in some aspects as an early feminist and as a way of challenging the conventional role of a Shakespearean woman. However in the final scene even Beatrice the independent, witty and intelligent heroine succumbs to the persuasive ways of men, love and society. The character of Hero can be interpreted in one of two ways.Critics say that Hero is conventional, not at all deep, but ladylike and deserving of sympathy this could be to uphold the reputation expected of her due to her start out and as a result of this, her high kindly status which can be seen in act 2 scene 1. But Hero can also be interpreted as an intelligent young woman that simply knows the right, and similarly the wrong, times to speak as can be seen in act 3 scene 4, a scene with only female characters in which Hero speaks of her own free will for herself. In Act 2 scene 1, Leonato makes it clear that it is his decision whom Hero marries and not Heros.Yet Hero says nothing throughout. This is what can make the character of Hero so hard to match to for a modern day audience, as this kind of behaviour is not as common or typical in a modern day girl of Heros age as it was in Shakespearean times. Although Heros lines in the play are often merely functional and slightly lacking, it is this her lack of speech, that most effectively represents her character and role in society. The only time the audience is shown Heros wittier and more relaxed side is when she is surrounded by only female company.Beatrice in Act 2 scene 1however, does not hold back with her opinions, when Antonio says well, niece, I trust you will be ruled by your father Beatrice speaks for Hero by saying yes, trustfulness it is my cousins duty to make curtsy and say Father, as it please you This can be seen as Beatrice either mocking Hero, or taking pity on her. But at the same time rather aptly sums up Heros purpose. Hero has functional lines in the play and only really speaks when given permission, such as in act 2 scene 2 when she says I will do any modest office, my lord modest being the life-or-death word in this line.The first time we hear Hero speak for herself is at the masked ball. However, it can be interpreted that Shakespeare uses this opportunity for Hero to blur behind a mask to grant her the freedom to speak for herself, and in normal circumstances this would not be the case. In act 3 scene 1, we see a very different side to Hero than Shakespeare has previously portrayed. In this scene there are no men and so Hero is free to say as she pleases, this freedom is furthered by Ursula and Margaret, both servants, both females, and both, therefore, bel ow Hero in terms of social status, being the only other characters in the scene.In this scene Hero is given more lines than she has throughout the rest of the entire play. The scene opens with Hero giving Margaret an order run thee to the living room there shalt thou find my cousin Beatrice whisper her ear and tell her, I and Ursula walk in the orchard and our whole discourse is all of her up until this point this kind of assertiveness and power is completely unexpected of Hero to the audience.Hero then goes on to give Ursula clear and precise orders of what she must do when Beatrice doth come however, in act 3 scene 4, where the characters present are again all female, Hero is not as outspoken and forward. However one of the characters present is Beatrice, this suggest thats Beatrice overpowers Hero, and although Hero is technically more powerful and important than Beatrice, as she is Leonatos daughter, her lines are still functional and infrequent such as these gloves the tally sent me they are an excellent perfume.Hero is mirrored in a similar way to how Beatrice is mirrored in Margaret in Ursula. Out of Margaret and Ursula, Margaret is as it is between Beatrice and Hero the more loud and opinionated one, as opposed to Ursula who is more quiet and reserved, and like Hero is given functional lines madam, withdraw the prince, the count, signior Benedick, Don John, and all the gallants of the town, are come to fetch you to church. In act 3 scene 4, Margaret is the dominant speaker, mocking Beatrice and talking back to Hero troth, I think your other rabato were better. . Heros response to this no pray thee, good Meg, Ill wear this is uncharacteristically sure of herself, showing that she didnt really care about Margarets opinion, and chooses to ignore it. This suggests that Hero is perhaps not a pushover as she is made out to be, but rather knows her place and what is expected of her, and so, when she is around certain company (i. e men) she is more reser ved, so as not to get herself into trouble, giving reason to suspect Hero is perhaps smarter than a modern day audience would give her credit for.The other characters, in particular Claudio and Leonatos, expectancy of Hero is really emphasised when Margaret and Borachio set her up to be shamed. As even suspicion of Hero doing such causes great controversy and trouble, and is near enough the sole cause of the rest of the problems in the play from then onwards. Whereas, when it is found out that it was in fact Margaret, the act is completely overlooked. This reinforces the importance of social status within the play.Shakespeare both challenges and supports male chauvinism at times by exploring the social boundaries of women. This is done through the characters of Beatrice and Margaret, with their outspoken nature and Beatrices seemingly unconventional outlook on life, but he does not cross these boundaries. As is seen in Act 4 scene 1 in which Shakespeare reflects and reinforces the s eparate roles 16th century society has created for males and females when Beatrice proclaims O that I were a man With Beatrice being the main character to challenge the conventional role of a woman, she of all characters being the one to say this, shows that there are still restraints put in place by society on things seen as acceptable for women to do. Beatrice repeats this line several times, interrupting Benedick with more of her self pitying rant every time he tries to support his reasons for objecting to killing Claudio.This can be seen as giving Beatrice, an heir of damsel in distress a conventional and necessary role in romantic comedy, which contrasts with her characters less conventional role as a woman in the society she is in. Also in this scene, Shakespeare uses dramatic irony, when Claudio says you seem to me as Dian on her orb saying that Hero seems innocent, and pure, but he continues to say but you are more intemperate in your blood saying that he has realised Her o is not as she first appears and sees her more as someone who sleeps around.The audience, of course, knows this is not true. But the use of the dramatic irony here portrays the two sides of a woman, and shows how much Leonatos reputation lies on Heros actions and status. Hero is a character that at first glance seems insignificant in the sense that she is rarely given opinions or a pretend to speak. However the role that she plays is vital to romantic comedy as the young, innocent, female. This necessity of female characters to the plot and genre of the play despite their portrayal as being inferior to men is what is ironic in Much Ado About Nothing.

Media and Body Image

Media and Body Image The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), an organization led by Ingrid Newkirk, fghts for the rights of animals tout ensemble over the world. According to PETA (n. d. ), its main goal is to give attention on the four areas in which the largest numbers of animals suffer the most intensely for the longest periods of m on factory farms, in the clothing trade, in laboratories, and in the entertainment industry. However in the year 2009, the animal rights organization produced a billboard attempt that went beyond its mission statement. It can be said that PETAs billboard budge is npleasant to most people.It is evident in the campaign that it depicted an oversized woman article of clothing a swimsuit, with the caption Save the Whales Lose the Blubber Go Vegetarian. Literally thinking, there is no connection between saving whales, and going vegetarian to lose weight. Clearly, PETA through the campaign is attempting to draw the connection between the ads target market and the whales that need to be saved. Is there certainty that PETA intended to create an offensive billboard campaign for people who are overweight? According to PETAs writer, Liz Graffeo 2009), she and her team specifically launched the advertisement for the residents of Jacksonville.She added that the reason why PETA launched the advertisement is to help people of Jacksonville, lose the blubber, by becoming vegetarians. The real reason why PETA launched an advertisement is to persuade people to live a healthy lifestyle and not to promote whales wellbeing. In my opinion, as an animal rights organization, PETA does not have the right to compare fat people to whales. PETA has to realize that those people who showcase their bodies in different swimsuits are confident equal about their size. The human being should never be depicted as endangered like whales.To add, the poster is not only disrespectful to the obese but to the human race as a whole. If PETA wants to create an advertisement beyond its mission statement, it should be sensitive enough to the target audience of its campaign. Reference heel PETA (n. d). Our Mission Statement. Retrieved from http//www. peta. org/about/ default. aspx Liz Graffeo. (2009, Aug 8). Lose the blubber Go Vegetarian Article. Retrieved from http//www. peta. org/b/thepetafiles/archive/2009/08/17/10se-the- blubber-go-vegetarian. aspx Media and Body Image By vmsl

Argument for Paying College Athletes Essay

Have you ever heard of a business that made billions of dollars, yet did not pay their employees? Seems charming remarkable doesnt it? Well this business is known as the NCAA. According to an article in the New York Times, the NCAA made $770 million from just the three-week Mens Basketball Tournament, but how much did the ath permites who participated in utter tournament happen? If you said zero then you would be correct. The athletes that poured their blood, sw run through and tears into practice day-after-day and into the 30 plus game regular season did not see a dime. It is hard to fathom how an industry of this size lavatory make so much coin, yet not allow the athletes that help them make that coin see all dividends.Being a college athlete myself, I leave lived the contend of trying to maintain grades, while going to practice and games during the week. Imagine trying to keep a job during this hectic schedule. It is hard for college athletes to find extra money to over hear a pizza or go see a movie. It is especially hard for athletes coming from tough backgrounds. Two out of every fiver Division I athletes fall out from single parent homes and athletics are their only opportunity to provide a future for themselves and their families. It is not easy for these students to chafe jobs because their schedules are already full. For example, many division I football game teams practice twice a day. A day for a division I football player could look like this practice-6 a.m., class-9 a.m., class-11 a.m., and practice-2 a.m.By the time they are done with the second practice of the day their day is practically over. They still have to eat dinner and possibly do homework. This leaves no time to get even a part-time job. It also raises the question of how these athletes obtain extra spending money? If you are an athlete like Johnny Manziel, who comes from a rich oil family, money comes easily and is not a concern. For those who are less fortunate and come from a single parent home or from a poor household the money does not comeeasily. So when a coach approaches and says, Hey, let me buy you lunch, many kids do not think twice and accept the $20. This goes against NCAA rules and if found out there is an investigation which could result in a suspension.College athletes can observe while walking to class or on the field students wearing jerseys with their name and number on them. Schools can charge anywhere from $50-$70 for a jersey like that, and where does that money go? It goes directly to the school and the athlete whose jersey is being worn all around campus will not see a dime of it. In the early 90s while the Fab Five was at the University of Michigan, Chris Webber, Jalen Rose, Juwan Howard, Jimmy King and Ray capital of Mississippi started a college basketball revolution. Michigan became the first school to ever start five freshman in a college basketball game. These five wore baggy scam and black socks. They took the nation by storm and soon Michigan merchandise was flying off the shelf. None of the Fab Five saw any remuneration and when they took notice of what was happening they started to question why. It is well documented in the ESPN dissipate The Fab Five all five wondered why they were not seeing any dividends from all the merchandise being sold. Jalen Rose came from a rough neighborhood in Detroit, so he fell into the category of the struggling college athlete. He admits during the film to taking money at times to buy pizza.Current Houston Texans running back Arian Foster said he received money on the post while he attended the University of Tennessee. In a recent Sports Illustrated article he said, I dont know if this will throw us into an NCAA investigationmy senior year, I was getting money on the side (Sports Illustrated, 2013). He went on to say, I really didnt have any money. I had to either pay the rent or buy some food. I remember the feeling of like, Man, be careful. But theres not hing reproach with it. And youre not going to convince me that there is something wrong with it (SI, 2013). This is the feeling of many college athletes that were in the same boat or that are currently in the boat.They may not know where their next meal is coming from or how they are going to afford a car payment. Many will take aim money and not even question it. They know what they are doing is wrong and theyare putting themselves and the school in jeopardy. At the time the reward is expense the risk they are taking. on that point are many other cases happening across the country that no one knows about. It is interesting how Foster came out and said how he felt that it was not a big deal and that he did not think he was doing anything wrong. He would fall into a large part of college athletes that feel it is unfair for them to not see anything from all the revenue they bring in.Many will argue that college athletes do not need to be counterbalance because they are student-a thletes and the key word for them is student. One argument against paying college athletes is that they are basically receiving a free education from a top school. A four-year apprehension will cover everything a student-athlete needs. This includes tuition, room and board, books, medical coverage and meals. For example, Duke University costs $57,180 to attend (Bleacher Report, 2013).Those on an athletic scholarship at Duke are receiving a higher(prenominal) quality education and are paying practically nothing for it. This is the main argument that those against paying student-athletes use. Most college athletes will not turn master key and hence will need the degree from whatever school they attend to obtain a job after graduation. Those who are talented enough to be drafted into the professional ranks of their sport will sometimes forgo obtaining their degree in favor of the money offered at the professional level. The downside to this is that an injury can end their career o ut front it even starts and those that did not obtain their degree will struggle to find a source of income if they are forced to quit or retire from their sport.another(prenominal) argument used is that student-athletes are not really worth anything until they reach the professional ranks (Bleacher Report, 2013). Those who use this argument believe that if a student-athlete is good enough to get paid then they will be compensated when the time is right. However, this overlooks the efforts of athletes who play all throughout college, yet do not make it to the professional level. There are many other arguments used but a common one is paying college athletes will not eliminate scandals. Scandals are not revolutionary to college sports. There have been numerous pointshaving scandals and the argument is that even paying college athletes will not stop those scandals from happening.Paying college athletes is a hotly debated study and will be so for the foreseeable future. There will be well made arguments for both sides but in the end college athletes need to receive some sort of compensation. With all the revenue they bring the school there needs to be a system in place to give a kickback to the athletes. There are many ideas and plans that can be put in place to give some sort of compensation. Student athletes will not have to worry about where their next meal is coming from. It is up to the NCAA and the schools to come up with a system and stick by it.ReferencesDirlam, Z. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//bleacherreport.com/articles/1588301-theres-no-crying-in-college-the-case-against-paying-college-athletes Nocera, J. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/magazine/lets-start-paying-college-athletes.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 Remy, D. (2012). Why the New York Times Nocera is wrong. NCAA News, 5. Arian Foster admits in documentary he took money at Tennessee College Football SI.com. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//sportsillustrated.cnn.com/college-foot ball/news/20130920/arian-foster-documentary-comments-about-being-paid-at-tennessee/ NCAA wont budge on paying college athletes ESPN. (n.d.). Retrieved from http//espn.go.com/college-sports/story/_/id/9682086/ncaa-budge-paying-college-athletes

Grown up woman Essay

Sheila is disappointed with her lover (Gerald) she angry with her p arents, because they seem more anxious to impress the examiner with their social position accordingly to look loggerheaded into their own hearts and croupet you see both of you, youre making it worse. Shes irritated at the blindness of those who can non see what she has come to realize. Geralds confessions are followed by what is revealed astir(predicate) Mrs. Birling heartless refusal to help Eva Smith. Sheilas reaction is very very important.Her own feelings of guilt, her changed feelings towards Gerald, her vexation with her parents essential be shown. AT the same time the auditory sense must see how she reacts to the inspector as someone who is changing their lives of many in that room. Towards the displace of act 2 tensions builds up when the inspectors investigation and Mrs. Birlings reply begin to be pointing towards Eric having had a connection with Eva. Sheila tries desperately to stop her m otherw ise making a bigger fool of herself mother- I begged you and begged you to stop she says at the end. It is at this moment that Eric appears the panic and distress and helplessness must be shown in your face.In act 3 events move towards the climax and Sheila is a key figure in the action even she may not be one stage all of the time. The inspectors oppugn have began to draw out each character an admission of responsibility for what happened to Eva Smith though not all of them feel guilt in the commission in which Sheila and later Eric come to see. What comes to light about Eric is deeply upsetting to Birling and his wife. He drinks heavily hes the father of Evas child, he has stolen money from his father. The respectable outside of the Birling family is seen to be full off hypocrisies and dishonesty. Both Birling and Mrs. Birling are rattled. But each of you helped to kill her. immortalize that. Never forget that.Birlings reaction too the disclosures about Eric is typical Ive got to cover up this up as soon as I can. By fouls means he must prevent the scandal from getting known. He even begins to appeal to the inspector look inspector- Id induce thousands yes thousands. He feels no guilt but he only wants to use his money to hide the truth from getting known. The inspector leaves having made one final exam speech about fire and blood and anguish that will follow if people do not realize that we are responsible for each other. It is one of the most important dramatic scenes in the play. Sheila and Eric are completely affected by what the inspector has said.The senior Birlings feel no guilt they gullt think they have done anything wrong it turned out unfortunately, thats all. There is no change of heart. When Sheila repeats the fathers last words thats all she says it scornfully because she realizes her parents will not change. AT this stage you should show through your facial expression and the way in which you speak that your meeting with the inspector has been almost a religious experience.Later on when the inspector proved to be a hoax the others relax but not Sheila or Eric. To Sheila the inspector is a supernatural being there was something curious about him. He never seemed to be an ordinary police inspector. It is in relation to this that the audience must judge the reactions of the senior Birlings and Gerald when they learn that there is no inspector Goole . To you that is irrelevant because he has already changed your life and Erics also. He is more then a real inspector. When Birling says it makes all the difference your reaction must be one of bitterness and disbelief as you say I ideate were all nice people now. You can not believe that their moral sense can be so distorted.There are discussions later about the photographs of Eva Smith followed by news at the end of a woman who is indeed dead. This is dramatic but the real climax is when it becomes clear to the audience that the inspectors message about our responsibility for others that we dont live alone has been forcefully made. It will remain true heedless of whether the inspector was real and whether there ever was an Eva Smith.It is important for you too show the change that takes place in Sheila Birling through the reactions to the inspectors question your disgraced about the selfishness of your parents and the part you also played. You must show the entire change from you being a nave girl turning into a grown up woman. hieratic passes a great moral message in this story and enforces several times. We are all equal and we do not live alone we must look out for each other regardless of social class.

Qualities of Servant Leadership

QUALITIES OF SERVANT LEADERSHIP (From the feel of Nehemiah) If we look around the world today hoi polloi are crying for loss leading who pull up stakes be able to bring changes for the betterment of society, community, organizations, and nations. This has been true in the secular world and Christian organizations throughout record. Today, specifically talking astir(predicate) Christians, we populate that distinct churches and Christian organizations are in need of legal godly drawship, and this has been unmatched of the greatest needs since the beginning of the Church. So we know that leading are vitally important for the closely-being and growth of the Church.Leaders play an important situation in churches and societies, yet their responsibilities are not easy at all. Throughout write up we brush aside chit-chat that leaders beget played an important part in leading, guiding, encouraging, and leaving a heritage for the generations to come. umpteen leaders give way to do the task they were responsible to perform, and some perform with flying colors scarce when last for only a short time. But no matter how good a leader is, he does not stay forever. So, the most important thing a leader trick do is leave a heritage for the generations to come and glorify perfection in all he does.Good leaders ordain ceaselessly leave godly footprints which will guide future generations in the way they should go. If oneness were qualifying to talk about good leaders in the news, Nehemiah would be a prominent one. in that respect are not homophiley leaders like Nehemiah who completed the task of leadership successfully. piece of musicy leaders in the watchword are known as good ones, merely they failed at certain points in their live. However, the Bible has no record of failure for Nehemiah. So in this paper, my in tennertion is to present qualities that made Nehemiah a great leader.It is my prayer that we will be en courageousnessd and learn so mething from the life of Nehemiah. I hope we will truly be applying these principles in our lives and be challenged and transformed. I believe we will be effective handmaid leaders if we prepare our hearts to do matinee idols work as Nehemiah did. Background bill of Nehemiah To talk about Nehemiah it would be good to begin with his historical background and a brief history of the Israelites so that we can better under(a)stand him. Nehemiah was the son of Hachaliah. He was born of Jewish parents in exile. His get a line Nehem-Yah means the comfort of Jehovah. From this it is possible to assume that Nehemiahs home was a godly one. (Jensen, 46) He to a fault had a brother Hanani (Neh. 12) Looking back on the history of Israel, we know that after magnate Solomon reigned in Israel, the nation split into two kingdoms in 931 B. C. the northern kingdom (Israel) and the southern kingdom (Judah). later on that there were no good kings in Israel, entirely in Judah there were a few pa rt good kings. Kings like Asa, Jehoshaphat, and a few others followed matinee idols will for some time but they did not fall out to follow idol fully and wholeheartedly. So they failed at some time in their lives.Josiah was the only good king without blame that Judah had after Israel became two kingdoms (2 Kings 222). Due to their wickedness God punished Israel and Judah. The two kingdoms were interpreted into captivity several times. The Northern Kingdom pull down first, and the hoi polloi were taken into captivity by the Assyrians in 772 B. C. After a few years, the southern kingdom was conquered by the Babylonians, and they were taken into captivity in 586 B. C. After forty-eight years in captivity, in 538 B. C. , the Israelites first re shepherds crooked to Judah from captivity under the leadership of Zerubbabel (Ezra 11-22).The second return was in 458 B. C. led by Ezra (Ezra 71-10). In 444 B. C. Nehemiah returned to Judah, and God used him to guide Judah in remodeling the city circumvents and reordering the batchs social and economic lives (Zuck, 673). So there is a possibility that Nehemiahs great-grandparents were taken into captivity in 586 B. C. when Jerusalem fell into Babylonian hands. This tells us that Nehemiah was born in Persia. Dr. Knoblet says, Nehemiah was probably born in Persia around Susa sometime during or soon after Zerubbabels ministry in Jerusalem. (Knoblet, 19) Apart from all this information Nehemiahs genealogy is not known. Nehemiah was beneficial a mere man but he left his mark on history because he was an available man. (Stewart, 22) We dont know how a Jewish born, son of a break ones back become a palace servant but we do know that Nehemiah was the kings transfuse bearer while he was in Susa. (Neh 111). When Artaxerxes, the king of Persia gave permission to Nehemiah to return to Judah with his large number and remodel the wall, Nehemiah returned to Judah and served as the governor of Judah and led his people in r ebuilding the city wall.though there are various views on the chronology of the years of Nehemiahs service as governor, it is probable that he was in Jerusalem for cardinal years (444-432 B. C. ), went to Susa for two years (432-430 B. C. ), and returned. (Knoblet, 129) If we are going to find a man in the Bible who shows us what true leadership is really all about, it is no doubt Nehemiah. (Knoblet, 150) Now, the question is What made him a great leader? Why was he so effective in his ministry? Let us talk over the qualities that made Nehemiah a great leader. Qualities of Nehemiah Without spirituality one cannot be a good leader.Jenses says, Nehemiah was not a priest, scribe, prophet, rabbi, theologian or pastor. As a public official his vocation was secular, not religious. And yet, he all the way demonstrated in his service that spirituality is for the secular as well as for the religious vocation. (Jensen, 64) So, what makes Nehemiah a good and effective leader must obviousl y be his spiritual walk with God. Let us discuss some of his qualities 1. A Man who Feared God Nehemiahs qualities of leadership are all fasten to his fear of God. It would not be possible for him to do what he did without the fear of God.When Nehemiah returned to Judah he found the Jews were going through hard times. Talking about the condition of the Jews in Judah, George and Syme said, There had been drought, myopic crops and recession. But people had to eat, and taxes inexorably fell due. Many were so heavily in debt that, having no more property to mortgage, they were trim to selling their children into slavery. (George and Syme, 92) All these things happened due to the corrupt practices of the leaders and moneylenders but Nehemiah, unlike the other leaders, stayed pure.So, it is evident that when Nehemiah was the regulator of Judah, he did not practice any corruption because he feared God. (Neh. 5 15) Not only in reference to corruption, but in everything Nehemiah feared the Lord and as a result, he lived a life which was sweet to the Lord. His fear of God gave him boldness for he knew God was happy with his life. So, when Shemiah told Nehemiah to meet him in the house of God, intending to kill him, Nehemiah was not s flushd because he knew that God was with him. Seume comments on Nehemiahs boldness by saying, He feared man little because he feared God much. (Seume, 71) Thats the secret of his success in his leadership. 2. A who Knew Gods Word though Nehemiah was born and brought up in the land of captivity, it is evident that he read and intentional Gods Word and knew Gods promises for his people. This is evident because he quotes the book of Leviticus, Deuteronomy, and Exodus in Nehemiah 1 8-11. It would not be possible for Nehemiah to enquire about his brethren in Judah from Hanani who returned from Judah, if he was not cognizant of Gods promise for His people. 3.A Man of Right Burden When Nehemiah perceive that the survivors who were left fr om the captivity in the province were there in great distress and the wall of Jerusalem was overly broken down, and its supply were burned with fire, he was care-laden by it. (Neh. 13) This was the right field bear down because he knew Gods promises for the Israelites. But what he heard was the opposite of what God had intended for the Israelites. Since Nehemiah knew Gods promises for the Jews he was burdened because the Israelites were in distress and Jerusalem wall was broken. He was so burdened that the king Artaxerxes could see it in his face. Neh. 2 2) He wanted to rebuild the wall and point his people back to Gods promises and commandments. Thats the right burden because it is Gods burden. It is not possible to have the right burden without knowing the Almighty God and His promises. If Nehemiahs burden was not right he could have just enquired and been emotionally sad but never acted upon it to put things back in order. What a leader was by having a burden about Gods work 4. A Man of appeal When Nehemiah heard about the situation of Jerusalem and the Jews in Judah, he prayed to God. (Neh. 5-11) He interceded for his people and begged Gods forbearance for himself and his people. Paul N. Benware says, Nehemiah spent about four months in prayer. He confessed the sins of Israel and prayed for the opt of king Artaxerxes. (Benware, 152) This makes it clear that forrader Nehemiah did something he saught Gods will first. 5. A Man of Patience After Nehemiah heard about the reproach and distress of the Jews and the broken down wall of Jerusalem, he prayed to God and wept. (Neh. 1 3-4) He also prayed to God so that the king would have mercy on him and llow him to go to rebuild the city wall. (Neh. 1 11) But four months passed, and Nehemiah was patient to wait for Gods time. Wiersbe comments on Nehemiahs patience saying, Nehemiah patiently waited on the Lord for directions because it is through faith and patience that we inherit the promise (Heb. 612). He that believeth shall not make haste. (Isa. 2816). True faith in God brings a calmness to the heart that take notes us from rushing about and trying to do in our own strength what only God can do. We must know not only how to weep and pray, but also how to wait and pray. (Wiersbe, 638) 6. A Man of Action and Example Nehemiah not only interceded for himself and his people, he prayed to God that he would find favor in the sight of the king. (Neh1 11b) Moreover, he boldly told his burden to the king and asked his favor to go to Judah to do the business of the Lord. (Neh 2 3-8) God never fails those who seek His will and do His work. It is because of Gods work that Nehemiah found favor in the sight of the king. (Neh. 2 8b) As a leader Nehemiah did not just give commands, but he associated himself with his people, and he took part in rebuilding the wall. Neh. 421-23) Moreover, he did not depend on people, but he used his own things for his business. (Neh. 5 15-16) It is because of his ac tions that he was consider as a leader. He guided and led his people by setting an character. He put into practice what he said. 7. A Man of Careful Planning As a leader Nehemiah studied the problems before he did the work. He was careful to select a few men along side of him, and they enquired about the walls and gates at night and told no one before they knew what needed to be done. Neh 2 12-16) Before Nehemiah began the work, he al supple had an inspection of the place and knew what the situation was and what needed to be done. (McGee, 86) Secret goals and plans are what leaders should have in any ministry. Also, be careful not to make the secret too concealed that no one will know anything about it and it will bring no fruit at all. Nehemiah carefully handled this. Though he had a secret, he knew when and what to share about his secret plan. In the right time he revealed enough things to his people so that they would get to work and be able to extend to the set goals. Neh. 2 16) Commenting on Nehemiahs secret plans Swindoll says that before Nehemiah began his work, he did not say anything about his plans for three days. (Swindoll, 49) This shows that Nehemiah unplowed secrets when he planned, and after he carefully studied and made an architectural plan of the way to achieve the goals, he shared the plans with his people. That showed his incredible ability to balance things at the right time and in the right place. 8. A who Motivates After Nehemiah studied the problems and had a plan, he motivated his people to build the wall of Jerusalem.It is because of his facility that he knew what to say and the people understand his intention. So, without any hesitation all the Israelites followed his leadership. (Neh. 2 18b) The source of his motivating was in the Lord. Nehemiah trusted the Lord in all things. He had seen many things that the Lord had done for Israel and he believed that the Lord would continue to do so. In motivating his people Nehemiah said, Remember the Lord, who is great and awesome (Neh. 4 14) By saying this Nehemiah meant to say that, God helped us before and Hell help us once again He is our covenant God Thats wherefore Im hereThats why the wall is half up He is great He is awesome Lets continue to trust Him Lets not give up now (Getz, 81) What an encouragement for the Israelites, having such a leader who motivated in the right way 9. A Who knows well his People When the time came to rebuild the wall of Jerusalem, Nehemiah appointed leaders in different areas and they began the work. Looking at the work strategy, it is evident that Nehemiah knew his peoples ability, talents, and strengths. (Neh. 3) This is an extraordinary ability of Nehemiah. As a leader it is important to know well the people that we serve.This also tells us that Nehemiah was good in building relationship because it would not be possible to know people well without knowing them well. 10. A Man who is ready to face Challenges As rebuilding of the wall began there was opposition from enemies. Nehemiah was not afraid of them, and he was not discouraged. In the midst of challenges Nehemiah prayed to God and was ready to defend. (Neh. 4 9) But that was not the end for him. It is important to pray, but it was not the only thing they needed. To have prayed only would have been presumption and to have watched only would have indicated a lack of faith. Campbell, 39) Nehemiah balanced it all, and he was ready for challenges that came along his way. 11. A Man who relies on God When the Jews were opposed, Nehemiah turned to God and prayed to Him. Not only that, he directed his people to rely on Gods strength and readied to fight for the Lord. (Neh. 4 14) Throughout the course of rebuilding the wall, opposition came. But Nehemiah continuously prayed to God which tells us that he always relied on God for Gods work. Foullah says that, as a godly leader, Nehemiah was dependent upon God from whom he received his personal support and en couragement, which motivated him enough to succeed. Foullah) What a leader, seeking Gods will and relying on Gods strength rather than self confidence 12. A Man of forgiveness and Justice With the poverty situation among the Jews, there were richer people who did business with their fellow brothers. When the rich oppressed the poor in many unjust ways, there was an outcry of the poor against their own Jewish brethren, and Nehemiah acknowledged that. So, he assembled all his Jewish brethren and checkd all those who treated others unjustly. (Neh. 5 9) Nehemiah was bold to stand up for the poor and rebuke the sins of the rich because of his compassionate and just heart.His justice resulted in taking action against any sin immediately. Commenting on Nehemiahs instant reaction with sin Kidner says, Ever realistic, Nehemiah leaves no means for postponement or for second thoughts, and make sure that the promises are upgrade into oaths, properly sworn in the presence of the priests. (Ki dner, 97) Nehemiah was a leader who was impartial. He valued all people equally. 13. A Man of Generosity Nehemiah not only utter for the poor he also shared what he had with others. He fed one hundred and cubic decimetre Jews and rulers.Moreover there were others from the nations around them. So, Nehemiah prepared one ox and six sheep daily for them. Also, fowl, and once every ten days an abundance of all kinds of wine was prepared. (Neh. 5 18) 14. A Man of Wisdom When Nehemiah was invited by the oppositeness to meet in the house of the Lord to talk about business, Nehemiah sensed that he would be in trouble if he went there so he decided not to go. (Neh. 6) This is wisdom. Leaders should be exquisite of dangers and should deal with things carefully and wisely. Thats the wisdom Nehemiah had as a leader. 5. A Man who Respects others Though Nehemiah was the governor of Judah and knew Gods Word, he had a high respect for Ezra the scribe and worked together with him. (Neh. 8 1-9) Ne hemiah did not ever rule his people as his property but allowed others to serve in different ways. Moreover, he also appointed many leaders in different ways. (Neh. 3) This makes it clear that Nehemiah highly respected others. This is a good attitude for leaders. 16. A Man who is bold for God After Nehemiah returned from Jerusalem he found that Eliashib repared a room for Tobiah in the courts of the house of God. Nehemiah was angry and threw all the household goods of Tobiah out of the room and commanded the room to be cleansed. He also found out that the Levites had not been given their portions. So, Nehemiah gathered the leaders and commanded that portions for Levites should be brought to the house of the Lord. (Neh. 13 1-13) Moreover, Nehemiah strongly forced the people to observe the Sabbath, and gave warning to those who broke the law. (Neh. 13 21) He also contended with the Jews who married foreign women.Nehemiah cursed them, struck some of them, and pulled out their hair, and made them avouch in Gods name that they should not allow their sons and daughters to intermarrying with foreigners. (Neh. 13 25) It is evident that Nehemiah was bold for the things of the Lord. His actions would not be necessarily bad for that time period, in that culture and with the situations. If Nehemiah was bold enough to do that, it shows that he was right in doing what he did because no one was against what he did. As a leader, dealing with problems takes courage and Nehemiah did it successfully.Moreover, he cleansed every pagan thing and assigned duties to the priests and the Levites, each to his service. (Neh. 13 30) 17. A Man with a Thankful Heart After the wall was completed they dedicated it to the Lord. They celebrated the dedication with gladness, both with grace and singing. (Neh. 12 27) Nehemiah brought the leaders of Judah up on the wall, and appointed two large thankgiving choirs. (Neh. 12 31) This shows that Nehemiah always remembered how he prayed to God from t he very start, and now he came to God with a thankful heart because God allowed him to complete his project.The city was full of joy at the day of dedication. McIntire comments of Nehemiahs joyful heart saying, The voluminosity of the joy of Jerusalem is in the heart of Nehemiah, too. Speaking of the people upon the walls, he says, So stood the two companies of them that gave thanks in the house of God, and I, and half of the rulers with me. Jerusalem is a city of joy. Jerusalem is the city of the king. Jerusalem is the hallowed city. (McIntire, 99-100) A godly leader will always remember Gods goodness and will worship God with a thankful heart. 18. A Man of Humility In whatever he did Nehemiah did not seek fame or popularity.He did what he ought to do with humility. Talking about Nehemiahs humility Maciariello says it well Whatever his strengths or weaknesses of character, Nehemiah does not seek temporal rewards. Although, after completing the city wall, he leads rare religio us and social reforms during his two terms as governor of Judah, his account ends with a simple gather up that God remember his deeds on behalf of the people Remember me, O my God, for good (Neh 1331). Nehemiahs doings exemplifies the Christ-exalting characteristics of leadership enumerated in this article (sincerity, tenacity, mood, scope, realm, and rewards).His example endures as proof of the wisdom of godly principles of leadership and management. (Maciariello, 8) What can we Learn from Nehemiah The story of Nehemiah gives us an extraordinary example of a servant-leader motivated and acting for Gods ends. It also provides an example of the use of godly means in the pursuit of excellence in leadership and management, and the focus upon achieving exacting results. Looking at the footsteps Nehemiah left for the generation to come is incredible. What a great model of leadership he was Today in the Christian and secular world, there are great things that need taken care of.How are we going to begin the process? I believe the only way to begin is to turn our hearts to the Lord as a leader, and motivate others to do so. It is so evident from Nehemiahs life that without God nothing is possible. Mans strength is fallible and weak in itself, but God is infallible, mighty, and powerful. So, leaders should trust God in everything. Thats what Nehemiah did The leadership qualities of Nehemiah mentioned above are important for leaders in communities, Churches, and any Christian organization. The only way to begin is to fear the Lord and submit ourselves to Him.If we honestly take God seriously, I believe the other leadership qualities will be evident in our lives. The problem with leaders today in the secular and Christian world is the lack of the fear of God. We fail time and time again because we try to do things by our own strength. The singist says it well in Psalm 1271, Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it except the LORD keep the c ity, the watchman waketh but in vain. Let us remember that God is the source of every good thing, and to make the world better we have to turn to the Lord.Leaders should seek God first for wisdom and arrest in all they do. I believe there will be a difference in community, society, churches and any ministry if God is the first and foremost priority that every leader seeks as Nehemiah did. Bibliography Benware, Paul N. follow of the Old Testament. Chicago, Il Moody, 1993. Campbell, Donald K. Nehemiah Man in Charge. Wheaton, Il Victor, 1979. Foullah, Leopold A. The Characteristics of Good Leadership. Ezine Articles. Web. . Getz, Gene A. Nehemiah A Man of Prayer and Persistance. Ventura, CA Regal, 1981.Jensen, Irving L. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. Chicago, Il Moody, 1970. Kidner, Derek. Ezra, Nehemiah. Leicester, England Inter-Varsity, 1979. Maciariello, Joseph. Lessons in leadership and management from Nehemiah. BNET, Oct. 2003. Web. . McGee, J. Vernon. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. Nashvi lle. TN Thomas Nelson, 1991. McIntire, Carl. The Wall of Jerusalem is Broken Down. Collingswood, NJ Christian Beacon, 1954. Stewart, Paul A. Nehemiah the Involved Layman. Glendale, Ca Gospel Light, 1974. Sueme, Richard H. Nehemiah Gods Builder. Chicago, Il Moody, 1978. Swindoll, Charles R.Hand Me Another Brick. Nashville, TN W Group, 1998. Syme, George S. Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther. Denver, CO Accent-B/P Publications, 1981. Walvoord, John F. , and Roy B. Zuck. The Bible Knowledge Commentary The Old Testament, Colorado Springs, Colorado Victor, 1983. Wiersbe, Warren W. The Bible definition Commentary Ole Testament History (Joshua-Esther). Colorado Springs, CO Victor, 2003. Williamson, H. G. M. Israel In The Books of Chronicles. New York, NY Cambridge UP, 1977. Knoblet, Jerry. Exile and Restoration. Bradley, WV Appalachian Bible College, 2010.

Interest Groups Essay

They substitute advantageously in size and ideological perspectives. The strategies and tools employed by liaison groups are non static, and they discord depending on the geographical scope of their operations and the resources they endure. While close to amuse groups scarper to address a wide range of issues, some others deal with distinct issues. The life span of rice beer groups is besides not static. In this case, some groups contain long term objectives hence, they dwell active for long duration. For instance, the amour groups that come out at challenging form _or_ system of g everyplacenment issues and politics operate on a long term basis.On the other hand, some groups are usually initiated with an aim of achieving a situation end after which they are dissolved. For example, during elections, umteen groups usually emerge with an aim of ensuring that the process is handled according to the stipulated guidelines of the electoral process. A representative gove rnment is ceaseless(prenominal)ly formulated in manner that facilitates participation of contending pursuits, and at the same time it tries to mitigate the variance that inexorably accompanies faction competition.In the traditional creation of pluralism, contending interests work together by mobilizing resources and opinions in order to resurrect effective formulation and implementation of essential public policies. Institutions are formed to accommodate the inevitability of respective(a) and competing interest from becoming powerful enough to undermine the rights of others (Wilson, 2009). This process is governed by constitutional pro dreams, which stipulate the spirit of interest groups activities.Therefore, many interest groups that work together tend to stabilize semipolitical environment, and this en sufficients them to earlier their interests to the government. This implies that the pluralist vision of politics is an ideal vision of interest group politics and political institutions (Barber, 1990). The activities conducted by various interest groups can be used to differentiate them. For instance, some of them endeavor to address some(prenominal) public issues, enchantment others gull a narrow scope of private interests.There are two distinct types of interest groups, and they can be described as follows. First, we bedevil public interest groups, and they aim at working on issues that benefit the general public. For instance, they subscribe policies that provide equal opportunities that can be enjoyed by everyone in the society. However, the success of public interest groups may not be very substantial at an idiosyncratic level since they aim at r for each oneing out to many people. Some of the major public interest groups in his mob are National Taxpayers Union and Concerned Women for America (Orman, 1988). The second category is referred to as private interest groups. These are groups which endeavor to quarrel public policies in order t o specifically benefit their members or individuals that certification their interests. Nonetheless, the objectives and activities of private interests groups should not interfere with the wel off the beaten track(predicate)e of other individuals. Political self-importance interest is discernd to be healthy for a political system.In the USA, there is a democratic belief that contending interests maintain the society more successful. This is because bad policies are unendingly eliminated when various groups compete against each other Other examples of interest groups include business organizations labor unions, Professional associations, and Non Governmental Organizations (Grossman, 2002). The Relationship between amuse Groups and Political Parties There is no great disparity between political parties and various interest groups, because they are twain composed of individuals having common objectives and opinions.Apart from this, they are similar in the sense that they both see k to challenge government institutions, elections, and they all make public constitution choices (Brunell, 2005). Nonetheless, there are epochal variations between these two bodies. Generally, interest groups never directly support their own members to contest for public office, specially in a case where economic parameter is concerned. In most cases, interest groups never lease overt party labels, which electors use to identify and express their political affiliations (Dulilio & Wilson, 2011).However, some electors may link particular interest groups with specific parties in a general manner. For example, the Tea Party is often linked with the Republicans and the clean-living conservatives. In the recent past, public interest groups that are ideologically driven guard increased considerably (King, 2011). For instance, a there are some groups which have pushed the tax agenda in political circles. another(prenominal) distinguishing factor is that interest groups have a limited focus, and they only handle specific issues of concern in the public policy.For example, interest groups form around specific concerns like environment, free speech, tax reform, and labor standards (Petracca, 1992). In contrast to this, political parties tend to focus on several issues. Moreover, political parties try to merge some of these facades under one big umbrella. In some circumstances, interest groups seriously struggle against political parties. For instance, some internal rivalries have been witnessed in key political parties that operate in Texas.When elections were conducted in 2000, several environmentalists who were members of the Texas Democratic Party massively supported Ralph Nader, the Green Party candidate, since they felt that Al Gore was less committed toward environmental issues. They labeled him not green enough. On the other hand, some Republicans have tried to make the party conservative by working against some of their Republican colleagues. This indicates that the interest groups tend to favor parties and politicians that support their interests, and they ignore those who are less committed in helping them.Interest groups of all time aim at maximizing policies, while political parties are usually trying to obtain many social inter build seats. These competing interests form the manner political parties relate with the interest groups. According Thomas Brunell, interest groups have a preference as which party controls a majority of seats in relation, which leads them to direct true and electorally useful money to this party (Hay, 2001) When interest groups offer funds to the other party, they always fund it in a manner that is less effective.Interest groups usually execute this goal by offering strategic funds to this party as follows provide little financial support particularly to the popular candidates who do not necessarily have to be funded in order to succeed in the elections. They can alike choose to fund incumbent candida tes who already have political clout. Therefore, even if these groups offer funds to these parties, they always do it in a biased manner, and they favor only the parties that are likely to push forward their interests.These funds enable their preferred candidates to run their campaigns smoothly without experiencing financial hitches. Apart from offering finances, interest groups withal provide key information that enables their favorite candidates to be more competitive than other contenders. They also sensitize their preferred candidates on issues that always go election outcomes. All these services are organized by interest groups with an aim of fulfilling their common objective of influencing election results and policies. The fact that these institutions have a relationship is thusly undeniable.These groups often forge close ties and pursue similar objectives in order to enhance their political clout. Nonetheless, they remain independent, and their nature of operation and des ign also remain different. The space for action, speech and flexibility that is maintained in politics makes them much more political than interest groups (Grossman, 2002). How Interest Groups Try to Influence the President and the Congress? Although interest groups do not directly have elected members in political offices, they do aim at fixing their members into appointed positions.They normally do this to enable them perform their state functions through and through mechanisms that support the desired policies of the interests groups that facilitated their appointments. The fact that groups operate as political players has always been recognized and examined, even if not decently understood. The manipulation of legislative processes by groups is a question that has not yet been answered, and it is still macrocosm begged. in the midst of the period of the 1970 and 1980s, some explosions were witnessed in Washington, and researchers have wanted to clearly understand them.As many groups emerged in Washington, many people joined them, and the groups increasingly funded parties. The citizens at the same time criticized the roles of interest groups and joined them in large numbers probably to suppress the powerful corporate groups. The role of groups in policy issues seemed to have taken a new dimension, and everyone was keen to see how it happened. Therefore, it can be argued that group manipulation of the Congress can be identified by simply examining the development of legislation that a group is favoring.For instance, a groups ineffectiveness in legislative process can be measured through its failure to intercept unpopular bills. In general, interest group activities predict, at least in part, how far bills will progress through the legislative process (Brunell, 2005). The term influence as applied in this context is quite narrow from the perspective of interest groups, and it is broad from a congressional perspective. Interest groups perceive influence as a process that should produce good policies or prevent undesirable policies from being adopted.However, a group does not have to obtain policies from the Congress that directly indicate their actual desires or else a groups influence is seen when the Congress makes or discards a policy, which is in line with the interests of a group. From a congressional perspective, influence emerging from interest groups can come in several ways. Interest groups are often said to have manipulated the Congress when its members are compelled or encouraged to change the course or provisions of a given bill in order to meet the demands of the interest groups. This influence might come in the form of a change of wording, a passage from a subcommittee, and not passing from a standing committee (Orman, 1988). In this process, interest groups may lead to the change of legislation, and the chairwoman may not have the capacity to reverse the whole process of legislation, even if he does not like the conte nt of the bill. On the other hand, the president can also manipulate the Congress by working closely with the interest groups. As discussed higher up, the law making process can be indirectly manipulated through elections.For instance, an incumbent President may pass some bills in favor of some groups so that he may get some support from them during the next elections. Besides this, interest groups may support pliable candidates whom they can easily manipulate during the law making processes. This symbiotic relationship between the interest groups and the politicians to some extent affect the capacity of both the president and the Congress to formulate effective laws. governance in America has become complicated to many politicians.This is because interest groups have managed to seriously entrench themselves in politics and much of their attention has been geared towards influencing the White House. Since the American President has come to play an increasingly important role in th e public policy process, interest groups and their lobbyists now descend on the governing with the same vigor as they descend on the congress (Orman, 1988). In this context, the president is faced with the challenge of fulfilling the needs of the ordinary citizens and the interest groups. Interest groups have faced much criticism especially when it comes to policy issues.Its critics contend that most of the policy issues dealt with by interests groups have no connection to the desires of the public. The leaders of these groups have also been blamed for being dishonest because they always fail to fulfill the demands of their members. The weaknesses of the interests groups have been seen as one of the factors fussy with democracy in the USA. It has also been noted with a lot of concern that some political candidates have been seriously intimidated by some interest groups, and this further affects the reputation of the interest groups.ConclusionThe above discussion indicates that the American government is guided various institutions, which work together with an aim of building a more democratic society. The interest groups have been instrumental in addressing the plight of the public by ensuring that policy issues are handled properly. The effectiveness of the government has also been enhanced by the numerous contending interests. The American government has been able to adopt better policies due to the serious competition that exists among various institutions. These groups have played a primeval role of widening the democratic space in America.The American government has been influenced by several groups over the years to an extent that some individuals refer to it as a world of interest groups. The interest groups should, thus remain committed towards enhancing democracy and good governance. And I think those groups have same mission, its to make the government do something right like that should be. for example, national education thinks that the system of lesson in ur country have to be changed because it is not effective, so the collect the data to support their argument, and send it to government, and hope it will influence the policy.

Technology Is a Hindrance

In recent quantifys, technological advances corroborate become an absolutely central part of our lives. proficient advances pile gain plan of attack to various information and entertainment. However, it is said that technology is a hindrance, not a help, to students beca custom they are distracted by technological advances and wasting too much too much time on computer games and other new technology. In my opinion, those technologies are the tool for students to learn and gain access information.Take for example, when we have to do project or homework, we may regard to search information, word process the content and present the project by using the computer. There is much information in the internet. When we want to admit a birthday cake, we can search the recipe in the internet immediately. You can look up for the dictionary machine instead of the bulky cumbersome dictionary. At school, teachers use the projectors to teach instead of the textbook. engine room is a componen t of modern education.Without it, students will not learn the skills they need to succeed in a global work environment which is increasingly dependent on new technology. For instance, Students who learn how to make graphs and how to use presentation software will learn some of the skills they need to work in many melody environment. Moreover, because of the technology, the relationship between the students and teachers are more(prenominal) closed. If there are any questions that you want to take in the teachers, you can not ask them immediately.Nevertheless, it is not a problem with the technology. You can call or email the teachers to ask for help. Through the technological advances, you can work and learn more effectively can efficiently. All these need the help of technology. However, there are also hindrances for students sometimes. There are many entertainment options such as computer games, television which is easy for students to get distracted. Students may make their tim e networking, entertaining on those technologies.As a result, they will fine it hard to concentrate in class and lose focus on moot easily. Yet, if students use those advances appropriately, will they still waste too much time on websites, networking? If they are self-discipline, it wont be a hindrance for them. Contrary, they can learn to be self-discipline. Above all, technology does more goods than harms. I think technology is not a hindrance but a help when they have proper time management and a correct attitude to technology.

America And Ethnicity Of The Races Essay

Racial discrimination and accessible inequality is a worldwide social illness. This peculiarly happens in extremely developed countries that have capabilities of granting the needs of numerous immigrants from other countries. However, the provision of being highly developed is also a way by which countries become highly diverse in state and purification. Mainly, this is also the reason why there exists too much discrimination in the tell fiber of societies. In this regard, the the Statesn ships company is among the focus of the discussion of such issues.To be able to understand the bear upon of the said issue towards the society, two major public policies shall be examined in support of the said issue. The policies to be tackled in this paper would be pertaining to the Criminal Justice Policy and Immigration Naturalization Policy. Using the dismantlets that determine the said policies, this paper shall introduce the issues that govern the race and ethnicality issues of the the Statesn government and politics. Leon E.Wynters Transracial America Sells shows how the black-Americans already lead the entertainment industry. As he usually talks about the browning of mainstream commercial culture in most of his compositions, Wynter points out how the radical shift in the place of race and ethnicity in American commercial culture since the late 1970s really affects the preferences of people in the marketplace. He also adds on his essay how nonwhite Americans are giving so much profit to the entertainment industry.He says color has been distort by means of music, sports, television, news media and literature in a bold band that had never been sympathisen before. True, even the different expressions such as Wassup which came from the black-American culture is already widely accepted. Meanwhile, Langston Hughes Let America be America again talks about the long-lost conceive of of the American race. A unified democracy giving everyone a chance to live in a rather easy life through laboring everyone oddly those who are in dire need of employment.In his poem, he points out how much the land of America really belongs to those who plow it such as the farmers, to those who cultivates its culture and resources, to those who really serve their country to the hardest yet top hat way they could. Contrary to Wynters composition, Hughes sees the marketplace to be a place of greed widely employ people for its own profit and gains. To Hughes, this sort of false equality is rather a hindrance to the line up essence of the American dream.As obviously seen, both of the writers likes to show how possible it really is to attain the American aim of being unified as one country. One believes in what is obviously seen in the society specially on the marketplace where both white and nonwhite Americans gain the fame and thus influence the greater crowd of a mixed culture and depict a unified America, while the other strongly suggests on putting the littleer fortunate into employment and letting them gain from what they have earned since the land belongs to them.Consequently, Wynters vision of the dream of equality is far more obvious than that of Hughes. Wynters idea is more pragmatical and thus more appealing to almost everyone in the entire globe. Even other countries in reality see the reality of what Wynter says transracial sells. Surely, many will agree that the mixed culture of the white and non-white Americans is widely spreading in the whole world through media and entertainment. Since technology has already evolved so much, the unification of different races is easier attained through the use of the entertainment industry and commerce.As a fact, a bigger percentage of the world universe of discourse is highly influenced with what they see on TV or n the Internet which commerce usually uses as a medium of selling its products. Hughes poem on the other hand is also pleasant although its a bit of the less truth that is actually happening right now. We are actually leaving in a world where oppression is really rampant and the fact that it happens to those who are less fortunate, his vision of the American dream is somewhat hard to fulfill. Sad but real, we are actually keep in a society where the fittest in the group survives.It is also convincing when Hughes pointed out how greed affects the marketplace so much, that sometimes the equality that the entertainment industry shows is rather false since its only driven by profit-oriented goals of commerce and yet it doesnt care so much on the needs and interests of the greater hail of the lower members of its community who give it the chance of existing. After all, there would be no such kind of commercial success without the existence of those who patronage its product, the people who have lesser opportunity in the marketplace. alone even though he had such a good view on how the American dream could be fulfilled, he still lacked the practical w ay on looking on what has already been through with(p) to meet that certain American goal. As clearly mentioned in the evidences above, at some point, racism and ethnic discrimination may still be a main problem that the American Government should face. However, with the policies created by the political parties of the country especially regarding the immigration and criminal justice systems of the country, it could be seen how the community has been faring on the said issue so far.As mentioned by Patterson in The Ordeal of Integration, the large and continuous exploitation number of ethnic groups having a middle class life in America proves that the social policies of the country concerning ethnic groups are applied strongly and are re3ceiving fine results. Hence, the statement, which was made by Higham earlier, has been proven true and shown as a resolvable matter in the American society. Yes, the political balance of the country towards its views of the social minorities would continuously be improved and regulated.