The Civil War And Its Ending Of Slavery :: Slavery Essays

The Civil War and Its Ending of SlaveryThis paper is about the civil state of war and about how it ended bondage with theemancipation proclomation. I will also talk abou the physical loses of the war.The siemens, overwhelmingly agricultural, produced cash crops such ascotton,tobacco and sugarcane for merchandise to the North or to Europe, but it depended onthe North for manufactures and for the financial and commercial servicesessential to trade. Slaves were the largest single investment in the South, andthe fear of slave agitation ensured the loyalty of nonslaveholders to the economicand social system.To maintain peace between the Southern and Northern supporters in theDemocratic and Whig parties, political leaders tried to avoid the slaveryquestion. But with growing opposition in the North to the extension of slaveryinto the new territories, evasion of the issue became increasingly difficult.The bit Compromise of 1820 temporarily colonized the issue by establishingthe 36 30 p arallel as the line separating free and slave territory in theLouisiana Purchase. Conflict resumed, however, when the United States boundarieswere extended atomic number 74 to the Pacific. The Compromise Measures of 1850 providedfor the admission of California as a free state and the organization of two newterritoriesUtah and New Mexicofrom the balance of the land acquired in theMexican War. The principle of popular sovereignty would be applied there,permitting the territorial legislatures to decide the status of slavery whenthey applied for statehood.Despite the Compromise of 1850, conflict persisted. The South had become aminority section, and its leaders viewed the actions of the U.S. Congress, overwhich they had lost control, with growing concern. The Northeast demanded forits industrial growth a protective tariff, federal subsidies for shipping and interior improvements, and a sound banking and currency system. The Northwestlooked to Congress for free homesteads and federal ai d for its roads andwaterways. The South, however, regarded such measures as discriminatory,favoring Northern commercial interests, and it found the repeal of antislaveryagitation in the North intolerable. Many free states, for example, passedpersonal liberty laws in an effort to frustrate enforcement of the FugitiveSlave Act .The increasing oftenness with which "free soilers," politicians who arguedthat no more slave states should be admitted to the Union, won elective officein the North also worried Southerners. The issue of slavery amplification eruptedagain in 1854, when Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois pushed throughCongress a bill establishing two new territories -Kansas and Nebraska -andapplying to both the principle of popular sovereignty. The Kansas-Nebraska Act,by voiding the Missouri Compromise, produced a wave of protest in the North,